Why They Hate Him!
Hey Prof. Shalom!
It’s my intention to post this as much as possible, and perhaps you can pass along this sentiment to the Trump camp to help folks think about “Why They Hate Him”.
Not organically originated, the so-called “Trump derangement syndrome (TDS)” phenomenon was contrived in order to prevent Donald Trump from strategically or inadvertently awakening American African, US federalized citizens, Freed and Freemen, to their bequeathed, latent, but federal authority and power for “…their actual freedom”.
The proponents of all the aspects of illegal immigration, such as, DACA; the Civil Rights against the white supremacist, Anglo, USA “white man”, despite his legite internationally recognized by official world bodies of governances’ border laws, i.e., Immigration and Natulization”; and the most threatening to US federal citizens and therefore our nation, being the stealth-clever human, generational, biological “bomb”, i.e., so-called, 14th Amendment “Birthright Citizenship” custom, which began
to Upon which they learning, embracing as their own, then executing their federal laws, powers, and authorities of their federalized citizenship status in America, automatically shuts down illegal immigration, migration, and especially the so-called, erroneously claimed 14th Amendment, “Birthright Citizenship” custom.
The 14th Amendment is the dual-purpose “lock” that enshrines the 1866 Congressional Birthright Citizenship, Civil Rights Act (The Act) into the Constitution;
while simultaneously preventing foreign entities and individuals from gaining access to the sacred federal law for its Subject Beneficiaries, i.e., Freed and Freemen.
In his attempted March 27th, 1866 veto letter, President Andrew Johnson clearly names and describes the infamous “Any person born…” statement in Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, as well as the Act itself.
The key element is that “Any person born…” refers strictly to American Africans, like other Americans born within US borders, who were designated federal citizens by the 1886 Act on March 13th, vetoed by Johnson on March 27th, ratified and enacted by the participating States on April 9th, and ratified July 9th, 1868.
There is nothing in this federal law for fellow citizens that justifies exchanges, transfers, theft, or replacement, nor does it include foreigners who have invaded the borders of the Union Republic, seeking benefits exclusive to the legislation.
The “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”, according to “veto” Johnson, identifies the “Any persons born…” as African, former chattel slaves, who by March 17, 1866, were already US Citizens by Act of Congress, therefore, subject to the jurisdiction of the USA federal laws.
The Double “Under Jurisdiction” of American Africans, and only Americans with such status are first, as chattel slaves, then second, as US federalized citizens on April 9, 1866; then two years later, ratified on July 9th, 1868, as the 14th Amendment, the “lock” – “guardian” of it.
The Act, not the Amendment, granted federalized citizenship to Congress. The Act is Citizenship. The Amendment is the lock on citizenship.
False Narrative, that the 14th Amendment grants citizenship to anybody, not the legal visitors, nor even American Africans, let alone illegal alien foriegners.
Eligibility:
While the American Africans have dual “under jurisdiction”, more than qualifying them as the “Any person born…”, whereas legal visitors, i.e., aliens such as Ambassadors, consulate generals and staffs, tourist, visa holders, including Inetc., are not qualified; all the more reason that foriegners who evaded the proper US Constitutional portal into USA citizenship whereby Congress decides such, being Article I. Section 8, Clause 4 – ARE NOT.
“To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws…throughout the United States.”
Seventy-eight (78) years post the 1790 establishment of US citizenship of Art. 1i. Section 8, Clause 4, the US Federal Body also established and continues to establish specialized citizenship exclusively for the Freed and Freemen, July 9th,1868
The Three Dates of the Constitution:
- Signing: September 17, 1787, by delegates in Philadelphia.
- Ratification: Required 9 of the 13 states; achieved on June 21, 1788.
- Effective Date: The government began operating under the new Constitution on March 4, 1789.
- Final Ratification: All 13 states had ratified by May 29, 1790.
While these most consequential, last 15 years dating back 2011, when private citizens, Donald J. Trump began to publically question the birth of then President Obama, to his 2025 Presidential candidacy announcement and very early days of the campaign, to the present of 2026, he has been uncharacteristically been demonized as a purported white supremacist,.
This tagging of Trump, is what the Democratic Party has tagged every Republican Presidential candidate with since the 1964, Goldwater vs, Johnson campaign (so nothing new), except brash towards women, and having a supper, self-inflated ego tripping attitude, etc..
It was cleverly orchestrated by someone, and for a specific purpose that the general public is not aware of.
-
Purpose
-
This document offers a calm, analytical examination of the intense political hatred that has emerged in recent years—particularly as it has focused on Donald J. Trump.
It does not defend or condemn any political figure or party.
Its purpose is diagnostic, not persuasive.Like a medical evaluation, it begins with symptoms, distinguishes them from similar conditions, examines underlying causes, and explains why a particular focal point emerged.
Understanding precedes healing.
I. Presenting Symptoms
Across political and demographic lines, the following patterns have become widespread:
-
Emotional reactions disproportionate to immediate events or policies
-
Moral certainty combined with resistance to self-examination
-
Dehumanization of perceived opponents
-
Crowd reinforcement and emotional contagion, especially online
-
Justification of risky, irrational, or unlawful behavior in the name of virtue
-
Identity fusion with opposition to a single figure or symbol
-
Chronic anger, anxiety, and emotional exhaustion
These symptoms often feel righteous and energizing, yet prove socially and personally destructive over time.
II. What This Is NOT
The phenomenon examined here is not:
-
Ordinary political disagreement
-
Legitimate civic protest
-
Rational concern over policy outcomes
-
Normal moral conviction
-
A left–right or party-specific trait
-
A reaction explained by personality flaws alone
Healthy dissent allows restraint, dialogue, and proportionality.
Hatred seeks eradication, not resolution.
III. Underlying Conditions
Several conditions converged to make this reaction likely:
-
Narrative collapse — declining trust in institutions that once defined truth and legitimacy
-
Identity destabilization — political beliefs becoming inseparable from personal worth
-
Unresolved historical tension — past conflicts resurfacing symbolically rather than analytically
-
Media incentive structures — outrage rewarded, reflection penalized
-
Crowd psychology — emotional contagion overriding individual judgment
-
Moral simplification under stress — complexity replaced with binary thinking
-
Meaning vacuum — emotional intensity substituting for purpose and belonging
In such environments, symbolic figures absorb far more hostility than their actions alone warrant.
IV. Why Donald J. Trump Became the Focal Point
Trump became the focal point not because of a single policy or flaw, but because he disrupted multiple protected narratives at once:
-
He shifted from a tolerated cultural figure to a challenger of legitimacy
-
He violated symbolic boundaries surrounding President Obama’s status and meaning
-
He challenged post-1960s party moral authority and historical narratives
-
He reframed immigration and citizenship in ways that reordered assumed beneficiaries
-
He reopened constitutional and historical questions many considered settled
-
He invoked Abraham Lincoln as an unfinished project, unsettling existing orthodoxies
-
He bypassed traditional intermediaries, undermining narrative gatekeepers
In this sense, Trump functioned less as a cause than as a catalyst—activating tensions already present and concentrating them onto a single figure.
Conclusion
The intensity of political hatred in America today cannot be understood by personality, policy, or partisanship alone.
It reflects:
-
unresolved historical questions,
-
destabilized identities,
-
and emotional contagion amplified by modern systems.
This examination does not ask readers to change their politics.
It asks them to reclaim discernment, resist crowd intoxication, and recognize when hatred masquerades as virtue.Understanding is the first act of freedom.
-