EVIDENCE of “All Persons Born”, Means EXCLUSIVELY Freed and Freemen
Ironically, the best voice, i.e., “Exhibit A”, as to who between what is dubbed, “anchor babies” and The Chattel Slave Babies, righteously and exclusively possesses the legal, moral, intellectual proprietorship of the United States of America’s 14th Amendment, “Birthright Citizenship”, is the March 27, 1866, Veto Letter to the Senate by President Andrew Johnson (#17).
In it, President Johnson repeatedly and clearly states that the identities of Beneficiaries are the Chattel Slave Babes.
To see the numerous times the President refers to them, albeit in a negative light, view Fear of “Black” Constitutional Power
For more in-depth study, please visit The Directory
Shortly after ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment in December 1865, on January 5, 1866, Lyman Trumbull, the Senator from Illinois, introduced the first federal civil rights bill in the nation’s history.
According to Trumbull, the “abstract truths and principles” of the Thirteenth Amendment meant nothing “unless the persons who are to be affected . . . have some means of availing themselves of their benefits.
On March 27, 1866, President Johnson did not veto the 14th Amendment, which was finally ratified by Congress on July 28, 1868, with its five (5) Sections. Instead, he vetoed its Progenitor-Parent, the April 9, 1866 Civil Rights Act (The Act), with its ten (10) Sections.
Therefore, President Johnson based his veto primarily on the contents of The Act’s ten (10) Sections.
Along with The Act, the document that became the 14th Amendment was also submitted to him, by which he addressed its’ Section 3, referring to it as vengeful toward certain former Southern Confederate States.
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, after all, could be used to block many former Congressmen and Senators from Southern states, because they engaged in insurrection against the United States. It was a direct attack on Johnson’s promise to forge a centrist coalition with the South.
Spec. Note: On March 3, 1865, Congress passed “An Act to establish a Bureau for the Relief of Freedmen and Refugees.”
In February 1866, both Houses of Congress debated and agreed to a bill that they wanted the President to sign, thereby making it a permanent Amendment that prevents any future Congress from repealing it.
On March 27, 1866, after carefully studying the bill for his signature into permanent federal law, in a letter to the Senate, President Johnson vetoed it, saying,
“I regret that the bill, which has passed both Houses of Congress, entitled “An Act to protect all persons in the United States in their civil rights, and furnish the means of their vindication,” contains provisions which I cannot approve, consistently with my sense of duty to the whole people, and my obligations to the Constitution of the United States. I am, therefore, constrained to return it to the Senate (the House in which it originated) with my objections to its becoming law.”
…because, even without his signature, as soon as the last two (2) States voted in favor, the Act transformed into a permanent federal law.Albeit it had to be reenacted in 1870, with the First and Second Enforcement Acts, or Anti-KKK Acts, which gave birth to the Department of Justice.
Not “All” Americans, but only those born of and within chattel slavery, who, unlike willing immigrant, migrate to America based on their respective, individual, personal dreams.
Whereas, the ancestors of the federalized citizens had not and do not to this day, have, nor desire such dreams, because those with the American Dream ideal forced their purchased, African slaves, against their wills, naked, shackled in chains, into this land, formerly owned by the Indigenous Peoples, now homeless within their homelands, due to the immigrants dreams.Like no other Americans, federalized citizens are identified in the Constitution via The Act as “involuntary servitude”, etc., and Mr. Johnson’s constant references to them as such, this most gracious Federal Law is not based on it, but rather, these Americans ‘ exceptional, non-willing immigration experience.
Why would the 14th Amendment Act apply to anyone else, i.e., “All persons – Americans”, since according to Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution, and the first eight (8) Amendments of the Bill of Individual Rights, all legal immigrants are already covered by “birthright citizenship”, and therefore, there is no need for the 14th Amendment for themselves.
It’s morally unreasonable that a people, i.e., Americans, either already born or naturalized into all the freedoms and blessings of liberty of US citizenship, to also now claim intellectual ownership of federal laws designated, exclusively to Amreican Africans of chattel slavery heritage.
Therefore, it is immoral and illegal for “ALL” American citizens also to have access to the authority and powers strictly granted, deeded, and bequeathed for those Americans born here, but yet excluded from the Benefits of the US Bill of Rights and Article 1 Section 8, which has caused victimized devastation upon them for untold generations.
Such provides a double blessing of liberty, i.e., the Bill of Rights, Art. 1, Sec. 8, and the 14th Amendments, that open the 1866 Civil Rights door to super-citizenship powers status of the ONLY Americans upon whose enslaved backs this purported immigrant nation under GOD is built.
In reading some statements in certain books, and Wikipedia, the narrative of the 14th is that, it’s for ALL Americans, including American-Africans; or it became more defined, even though originally for them out of slavery.Even in the rhetoric of the truth, though federalized into the Constitution, American-Africans are still treated as second-class or afterthought citizens.
From the 1789 ratification of the Constitution through the Supreme Court’s Dred Scott decision, through the Civil War, to 1868, ALL immigrants born or naturalized were already entitled to such citizenship.
There is no need for them to be in on, nor partake of that which belongs exclusively to the chattel slave babies.
Note: “…protect all persons”. Laws already protected Non-slave Americans. They do not need such, and therefore are not entitled to the 4th Amendment or other related federal regulations, etc.
Note: “Vindication”, what and where is the moral justification for the federal government to replace the babies of the Law’s Subject Beneficiaries with those of foreigners illegally within the USA, thereby nullifying and/or robbing them of the Means for their Vindication.
Note: As immigrants were willing to come to America and were/are furnished with the Bill of Rights and the Articles of the Const. I, Sec. 8, what do anchor babies need Vindication from, based on the contents of the July 9, 1868/14th Amendment-1866 Civil Rights Act
This federal law was conceived and enacted by this immigration nation under GOD, to morally rectify its July 1776, militarily inherited from the British Empire’s role in the Transatlantic, African Slave Trade, and the 245 years, generations-destroying, peculiar institutionalized industry of chattel slavery.
The Law is not intended, nor ever will be, for the immigrant Americans under the citizenship of the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, and Article 1, Sec 8 of the Constitution, who have subsequently, generationally benefited from it.
President Johnson’s veto of The Act, particularly Section 3, due to its’ extraordinary powers of the Freedmen’s Bureau, exposes the weakness of the “All persons born” contention.
This is because immigrant heritage Americans are already empowered to US citizenship, albeit at the expense of the Law’s rightful heirs, doubly empowering illegal and legal immigrants with super citizenship authority over those to whom the Law is actually intended, thereby fatally nullifying theirs.
According to Section 1 of The Act, such powers of authority were/is granted to the Freedmen, so that they may catch up and EXPERIENCE “equal justice protection under the Law”, US citizenship “as is enjoyed by white citizens”, i.e., immigrants.
Otherwise, the immigrants’ gain further devastates the foundational people upon whose ancestors’ backs, this nation under GOD stands; therefore, in doing so, they destroy themselves along with the Union Republic.
Regardless of ethno-racial identity, including black Africans, all Americans of willing immigration are, in essence, “white” citizens. Therefore, two facts are revealed, namely:
The “imbibitional” connection
Metaphorically:
This Act is the “Rosetta Stone” (interpreter and identifier of the Subject beneficiaries, as a mother knows her own child) of the 14th Amendment, Section 1, by which it is permanently codified into the US Constitution.
The Act is the Progenitor-Parent of the 14th, in that the former is the supplier of the life substance to its infant child, the latter.
Albeit, as the Parent, the former identifies, defines, and explains the authority granted to these new, unprecedented, US federalized citizens, as those Americans of chattel slavery heritage, i.e., involuntary servitude.
In contrast, the “visible” are the hair, skin, and eyes, which are the 14th Amendment. One without the other is incomplete and cannot live.Therefore, attempting to understand, let alone explain, the “All persons born”, is impossible without the inclusion of the Act, and thereby the 14th Amendment is its condensing.